Tim Smyczek vs Izak Van Der Merwe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smyczek vs Merwe analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Smyczek vs Izak Van Der Merwe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Smyczek 0 - 0 Merwe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smyczek has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Merwe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smyczek, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Merwe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smyczek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Merwe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smyczek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Merwe winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smyczek has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 92/ 60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 42/ 49). Merwe has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smyczek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Merwe has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smyczek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Merwe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smyczek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Merwe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
8
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
40
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tim Smyczek vs Izak Van Der Merwe For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Smyczek VS Merwe
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tim Smyczek | Izak Van Der Merwe |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tim Smyczek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Tim Smyczek
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Smyczek
Player
Matthew Ebden
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Smyczek
Player
Norbert Gombos
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
15
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tim Smyczek
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mischa Zverev
Player
Tim Smyczek
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Smyczek
Player
John-Patrick Smith
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tim Smyczek
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Tim Smyczek
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Corentin Moutet
Player
Tim Smyczek
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tim Smyczek
Player
Mitchell Krueger
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Izak Van Der Merwe Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Louk Sorensen
Player
Izak van der Merwe
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Izak van der Merwe
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Liang-Chi Huang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Izak van der Merwe
Player
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Player
Izak van der Merwe
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
24
Total Points Won
20
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Izak van der Merwe
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Izak van der Merwe
Player
Ivan Endara
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Smyczek Vs Merwe Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Smyczek are available here and Merwe photos here.